Search Results
7/19/2025, 11:44:55 PM
>>7654470
>Every time AI is injected into anything, it's done as sneakily as possible
This isn't true at all. There's a ton of fucking "USING AI TECHNOLOGY" shit all over now.
>people hide their prompts
Not true at all, where the fuck are you looking? Most AI people I've seen are giving their shit out all over when asked, or they embed it into the image's metadata for other people to download.
>They are junkies addicted to instant gratification
Anon this is most people. 90% of everything is shit for a reason. Of all the things that happen in your life, you are going to only care enough about around 10% of it to put effort in. And a large portion of that is already taken up by personal relationships.
Most of the random shitheads using chatgpt and midjourney to make crappy images to assist in their hustling, political shitflinging are actually using it for the equivalent of picrel. They're just generating something that fits a basic emotion or purpose. They aren't putting any artistry into it and they won't claim it's something they did with any form of effort or desire to be recognized for it.
There are dumbfuck AI artists who don't know what they're doing and spam ugly as sin things, just like there are /permabegs/ who aren't self-aware enough to realize that their tracings and crayon drawings are an eyesore, and photographers who upload a billion crappy, poorly exposed and shaky images. But there are also people who ARE actually putting effort in and sharing such techniques, contrary to your assertions. So every problem with AI art is not unique to AI art.
I don't see the point of fucking waging war on other artists like this. No AI artists I've talked with have looked down upon me and they have appreciated that I treat them as equals. At least one even started doing non-AI art after I spoke with them about ways to improve their AI art.
>Every time AI is injected into anything, it's done as sneakily as possible
This isn't true at all. There's a ton of fucking "USING AI TECHNOLOGY" shit all over now.
>people hide their prompts
Not true at all, where the fuck are you looking? Most AI people I've seen are giving their shit out all over when asked, or they embed it into the image's metadata for other people to download.
>They are junkies addicted to instant gratification
Anon this is most people. 90% of everything is shit for a reason. Of all the things that happen in your life, you are going to only care enough about around 10% of it to put effort in. And a large portion of that is already taken up by personal relationships.
Most of the random shitheads using chatgpt and midjourney to make crappy images to assist in their hustling, political shitflinging are actually using it for the equivalent of picrel. They're just generating something that fits a basic emotion or purpose. They aren't putting any artistry into it and they won't claim it's something they did with any form of effort or desire to be recognized for it.
There are dumbfuck AI artists who don't know what they're doing and spam ugly as sin things, just like there are /permabegs/ who aren't self-aware enough to realize that their tracings and crayon drawings are an eyesore, and photographers who upload a billion crappy, poorly exposed and shaky images. But there are also people who ARE actually putting effort in and sharing such techniques, contrary to your assertions. So every problem with AI art is not unique to AI art.
I don't see the point of fucking waging war on other artists like this. No AI artists I've talked with have looked down upon me and they have appreciated that I treat them as equals. At least one even started doing non-AI art after I spoke with them about ways to improve their AI art.
6/8/2025, 8:02:47 PM
>>7601391
>I wouldn't call this art, this was more of a decoration thing, and most of my customers were friends of relatives, but maybe you can just call interior designers, there might be actual demand for unique paintings that don't look like they came from IKEA and make a room look cooler.
Anon this is what most normies think art IS. It's why they tend to both see no value in digital art. It's also why they generate the most boring AI slop - zero value, it's just "haha internet picture! look its an old lady dunking a basketball!" and then they forget about it the next day.
>I wouldn't call this art, this was more of a decoration thing, and most of my customers were friends of relatives, but maybe you can just call interior designers, there might be actual demand for unique paintings that don't look like they came from IKEA and make a room look cooler.
Anon this is what most normies think art IS. It's why they tend to both see no value in digital art. It's also why they generate the most boring AI slop - zero value, it's just "haha internet picture! look its an old lady dunking a basketball!" and then they forget about it the next day.
Page 1