Search Results
6/21/2025, 6:52:00 AM
>>105657706
Sheeple, who vastly outnumber intelligent people today, circlejerk the "durr it's full of ads and spyware" line until it becomes a moral panic, so people stay away from the recently-released Windows X+1. This is always the first step, and has been since at least Windows XP, when tards with always-on internet connections started flooding into computing. Before that, most users had a clue what they were doing, and internet access wasn't assumed by either the OS or said users.
The second step is that people who are in the know - group that, nowadays, is a single-digit percentage of the user base - look through Group Policy and the registry, see all the new options Microsoft provided, and change the ones that alarm them. This starts as .REG files and/or long, annoying command-lines on Superuser. But as time goes by, they get refined into memescripts, then friendly GUIs, to deploy these changes.
By the third step, all smart computer users (15% and still dropping in 2025) know that Windows X+1 is good stuff once you configure it. Being smart, they're employed - so spending $1,000 to run a next-generation OS isn't an issue. Knowledge that Memescript v168.04 makes Windows X+1 great is getting out. But the sheeple have a problem: they've spent the last two years screaming how bad X+1 is, and they can't just change their opinion without wrecking their credibility. A portion of this group will go on to become Windows X "baby ducks", because holding onto a dead OS is better than admitting they were wrong.
>YOU ARE HERE<
At the fourth step, every new computer comes with Windows X+1. Poors are finding computers in the trash that are plenty good enough to run Windows X+1. Windows X goes out of support. 10 year old computers are being replaced, and drivers for Windows X dry up. Software starts having Windows X+1 as its minimum requirements. A "killer app" comes along, and suddenly Windows X+1 is now 90%+ of the market.
Then we hit step 5: Windows X+2 is released...
Sheeple, who vastly outnumber intelligent people today, circlejerk the "durr it's full of ads and spyware" line until it becomes a moral panic, so people stay away from the recently-released Windows X+1. This is always the first step, and has been since at least Windows XP, when tards with always-on internet connections started flooding into computing. Before that, most users had a clue what they were doing, and internet access wasn't assumed by either the OS or said users.
The second step is that people who are in the know - group that, nowadays, is a single-digit percentage of the user base - look through Group Policy and the registry, see all the new options Microsoft provided, and change the ones that alarm them. This starts as .REG files and/or long, annoying command-lines on Superuser. But as time goes by, they get refined into memescripts, then friendly GUIs, to deploy these changes.
By the third step, all smart computer users (15% and still dropping in 2025) know that Windows X+1 is good stuff once you configure it. Being smart, they're employed - so spending $1,000 to run a next-generation OS isn't an issue. Knowledge that Memescript v168.04 makes Windows X+1 great is getting out. But the sheeple have a problem: they've spent the last two years screaming how bad X+1 is, and they can't just change their opinion without wrecking their credibility. A portion of this group will go on to become Windows X "baby ducks", because holding onto a dead OS is better than admitting they were wrong.
>YOU ARE HERE<
At the fourth step, every new computer comes with Windows X+1. Poors are finding computers in the trash that are plenty good enough to run Windows X+1. Windows X goes out of support. 10 year old computers are being replaced, and drivers for Windows X dry up. Software starts having Windows X+1 as its minimum requirements. A "killer app" comes along, and suddenly Windows X+1 is now 90%+ of the market.
Then we hit step 5: Windows X+2 is released...
Page 1