Search Results
7/23/2025, 8:47:20 PM
>>511154116
Yeah, actually, "Gerrymandering" is a good thing.
>create a district where 51% of the population is satisfied with their representation
or
>create a district where 90% of the population is satisfied with their representation
People who argue against Gerrymandering don't understand that people don't settle in nice neat grid-like patterns. Communities will grow in weird ways, and it is best to try to group constituents with similar interests. Geography also plays a role, where it is also a consideration to include people that share a water supply, for example.
Gerrymandering is literally the IQ bell curve meme where the lowest and highest IQ realize it's a good thing, and all the midwits think Gerrymanders is le ebil.
Yeah, actually, "Gerrymandering" is a good thing.
>create a district where 51% of the population is satisfied with their representation
or
>create a district where 90% of the population is satisfied with their representation
People who argue against Gerrymandering don't understand that people don't settle in nice neat grid-like patterns. Communities will grow in weird ways, and it is best to try to group constituents with similar interests. Geography also plays a role, where it is also a consideration to include people that share a water supply, for example.
Gerrymandering is literally the IQ bell curve meme where the lowest and highest IQ realize it's a good thing, and all the midwits think Gerrymanders is le ebil.
Page 1