Search Results
7/15/2025, 10:37:19 PM
>>715558539
She looks like she is in her 18s. And she, in fact, is.
>>715558638
You are blind.
>>715558756
>they'll just offer it as GaaS instead
This is exactly what I'm thinking.
Because the entire point of SKG is "lifetime liability, EXCEPT if you make it explicit it's a service, then the law doesn't apply to you!". So everyone will just say it's a service because they don't want to risk having Doctor Hans Rosenberg suing them 30 years later for violating le european righterinos because exploits from 30 years ago resulted in little Jimmy's mom's credit card leaking and guess what, the europeans don't sleep on the GDPR and they don't care that "Ross promised I wouldn't be liable, it's the community that would be responsible for patching the exploits!!!".
>>715559254
Anon, if SKG applied to any sort of service, you would have an argument for Netflix being permanent after 1 month of sub, or WoW, or whatever. Something that is explicitly offered as a temporary service logically can't be subject to the law. To defy this logic would mean going against not only the lobbies of music/movies/any art you can think of, but also common sense.
She looks like she is in her 18s. And she, in fact, is.
>>715558638
You are blind.
>>715558756
>they'll just offer it as GaaS instead
This is exactly what I'm thinking.
Because the entire point of SKG is "lifetime liability, EXCEPT if you make it explicit it's a service, then the law doesn't apply to you!". So everyone will just say it's a service because they don't want to risk having Doctor Hans Rosenberg suing them 30 years later for violating le european righterinos because exploits from 30 years ago resulted in little Jimmy's mom's credit card leaking and guess what, the europeans don't sleep on the GDPR and they don't care that "Ross promised I wouldn't be liable, it's the community that would be responsible for patching the exploits!!!".
>>715559254
Anon, if SKG applied to any sort of service, you would have an argument for Netflix being permanent after 1 month of sub, or WoW, or whatever. Something that is explicitly offered as a temporary service logically can't be subject to the law. To defy this logic would mean going against not only the lobbies of music/movies/any art you can think of, but also common sense.
Page 1