Search Results
8/8/2025, 9:23:05 PM
>>512556384
They are both literal translations, but the KJV is Old English. However, both translations are translated from different manuscripts. The translation one uses should also depend on which manuscripts they believe to be superior. They both can't be right. One is superior than the other, but which one?
God is not the author of confusion. So why would he put dozens of different modern bibles out that change his word.
People who read The Message can say that "your bible is trash, this one is better". and with your logic they can't be wrong. you see, we have to have some type of standard. 1 bible to rule them all. use your head.
They are both literal translations, but the KJV is Old English. However, both translations are translated from different manuscripts. The translation one uses should also depend on which manuscripts they believe to be superior. They both can't be right. One is superior than the other, but which one?
God is not the author of confusion. So why would he put dozens of different modern bibles out that change his word.
People who read The Message can say that "your bible is trash, this one is better". and with your logic they can't be wrong. you see, we have to have some type of standard. 1 bible to rule them all. use your head.
Page 1