>>105730327
>but you're already in diminishing returns territory, if you're happy with the performance already stick to 3000C15
it's actually 3000C14
but yeah, thanks for all the advice, I might try playing with the drive strengths to maybe squeeze 3066/3133 or at least improve stability in case these new timings turn out to be unstable
btw, is it normal that my latency in memory benchmark stays around 75 ns no matter what I do? pretty much no decrease at all compared to cl16-20-20-38 xmp