Search Results
7/23/2025, 8:12:16 PM
>>213067994
well the question was about how they afforded it. and despite the occasional bad harvest, the population was rising significantly every year.
and yes, our life quality is definitely better, but we are going extinct still. women decided to stop breeding and rape is illegal so its over.
well the question was about how they afforded it. and despite the occasional bad harvest, the population was rising significantly every year.
and yes, our life quality is definitely better, but we are going extinct still. women decided to stop breeding and rape is illegal so its over.
7/13/2025, 11:11:05 AM
>>212713560
get better map
get better map
6/20/2025, 8:05:28 PM
>>211936432
at least you can afford to breed. noone else can
at least you can afford to breed. noone else can
6/7/2025, 9:07:32 PM
>>16690180
>clearly not intelligent
but they are quite good as knowledge system. they have potential to make many low skill white collar jobs obsolete.
doctor? ai will diagnose you faster and more precisely than most doctors you can afford to see.
lawyer? not even expensive lawyers know all the laws, not even lawmakers know all of them. properly trained ai model just for your legal jurisdiction can.
teacher? chatgpt already beats them cleanly. but that was almost always the case even before with youtube, before than with books. the ai just lowered the entry barrier even further.
lots of people also talk about ai replacing coders, projectants, middle managers and even art workers like music, movies, games and writers.
But as you said, it is not intelliget and the possibility of halucination can be really bad, especially if they fine tune it so well that halucination will be one in million event: the people relying on it wont expect it and it can cause damage. like the one where it told people to eat glue. so instead of world ending event i see it as just another productivity boost tool. like before book press it took 1 human 1 year to write a manuscript and it costed like a new house. nowadays books costs like a burger. with ai we might see same jump in productivity in various projects and professions.
>clearly not intelligent
but they are quite good as knowledge system. they have potential to make many low skill white collar jobs obsolete.
doctor? ai will diagnose you faster and more precisely than most doctors you can afford to see.
lawyer? not even expensive lawyers know all the laws, not even lawmakers know all of them. properly trained ai model just for your legal jurisdiction can.
teacher? chatgpt already beats them cleanly. but that was almost always the case even before with youtube, before than with books. the ai just lowered the entry barrier even further.
lots of people also talk about ai replacing coders, projectants, middle managers and even art workers like music, movies, games and writers.
But as you said, it is not intelliget and the possibility of halucination can be really bad, especially if they fine tune it so well that halucination will be one in million event: the people relying on it wont expect it and it can cause damage. like the one where it told people to eat glue. so instead of world ending event i see it as just another productivity boost tool. like before book press it took 1 human 1 year to write a manuscript and it costed like a new house. nowadays books costs like a burger. with ai we might see same jump in productivity in various projects and professions.
Page 1