Search Results
6/30/2025, 11:06:01 AM
>>714062649
we're talking about the g2g tests
if same test results in 8ms for rog ally x using ips, and 33ms for switch 2 you can make a guess how the 2 panels perform
theres other testers obviously but their methodology is unknown and isn't directly comparable with monitors unboxed results, the quotes support MU tests unequivocally
>The Switch 2 (built-in display) has broken the worst record.
>In fast-moving scenes, the afterimage stretches out. Gamers looking for a competitive edge should use a gaming monitor in docked mode.
>Response speed is very slow
>To be honest , the "Switch 2 (main display)" is not great when viewed as a display alone
> The response time is also very slow (17 ms), and afterimages are very noticeable.
we're talking about the g2g tests
if same test results in 8ms for rog ally x using ips, and 33ms for switch 2 you can make a guess how the 2 panels perform
theres other testers obviously but their methodology is unknown and isn't directly comparable with monitors unboxed results, the quotes support MU tests unequivocally
>The Switch 2 (built-in display) has broken the worst record.
>In fast-moving scenes, the afterimage stretches out. Gamers looking for a competitive edge should use a gaming monitor in docked mode.
>Response speed is very slow
>To be honest , the "Switch 2 (main display)" is not great when viewed as a display alone
> The response time is also very slow (17 ms), and afterimages are very noticeable.
Page 1