>33ms
>in 2025

>>714057948 (OP)
The average human reaction time is 250ms so this isn't even remotely noticeable.

If you look up any jewtuber video about the matter you will see 3 types of videos.
>Niggers simply parroting the "sources" if not outright watching them and reacting to them.
>Faggots trying to be fancy, but simply parroting the "it's not LE TRUE HRD and worse than oled".
>Techniggers doing fake tests.
The first two ones are self explanatory, but the third one is more insidious.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AB67B8LCorI
Skip to 3:50.
Not only the nigger is comparing it to 144-520hz high end monitors (granted, most are 144-165hz), he's also comparing them with the switch 2 at 60hz.
How was this done you ask? By comparing the pixel movement through an ufo test video.
How did they do it on the switch 2 you ask if it has not been jailbroken and the official filmware has no internet browser? Through a youtube video, which downclocks the screen to 60hz to save battery (because no jewtube video goes over that anyway) like any game that doesn't use the full 120hz would.
The video even literally admits to the downclocking around 4:50 even, "Switch 2 60hz IPS LCD"

Snoys have been totally mindbroken lmao, they have to reach miles to make up or find any miniscule flaw to blow wildly out of proportion to spam post after post about

>>714058017
Retard
>>714057948 (OP)
Yeah, it's actually dogshit. Switch oled or rog ally x are the way to go if you care about handhelds.

I really dont mind the switch 2's display, it can be shit on paper but really I don't notice anything egregious. the rog ally screen is noticably smaller and the colors are much worse in my opinion, and to me that matters more than latency

>>714058280
only a few games even engage 120hz mode. you're acting like testing 60hz mode is an egregious misuse of the average experience when it is what you will experience the overwhelming majority of the time.

>>714057948 (OP)
that explain this then https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNQ-HHE503Q

>>714060573
Yeah, it's serviceable. Colors are nice.
Tho it could be way better.

The weird part is it should be technically easy to have lower pixel response time
Modern ips panels have (according monitors unboxed) pretty fast native response times, somewhere around 10ms range, with zero overdrive.
Last gen ips panels had around 20ms response times with no od, thats what produced switch 1 and steam deck figures.

Then if you had any sorta overdrive that would result in better motion clarity at minimal battery life cost.

So all in all, what the fuck nintendo?

>>714060790
Is it possible these are cheaper panels so they could meet launch demand numbers? Nintendo have had multiple types of display at once before. Look at 3DS where it had both IPS and TN screens at the same time. Different batches in different factories.

>>714060724
True, the most kino thing nintendo could do is release a switch 2 lite that has an oled screen with minimal bezels. I am happy to consooom another switch 2 so I can leave my current one docked and have a nicer portable one that isnt aids to bring outside

>>714060887
when you use multiple manufacturers there would be rigid performance standards they must meet so theres no news cycle claiming "if you buy a switch from japan you get a better panel" or something.
33ms panels slipping through because nintendo doesnt QA would not be plausible, the issue is too widespread and no one has evidence of fast switch 2 panels

steam deck used BOE and samsung, they gave articles about how important it is to not rely on 1 source too.

>>714060790
he did the testing wrong anon, likely because he got paid money to shit on nintendo

>>714062649
This. I only trust xXxDarkMarioxXx on reddit that doesn't have any testing equipment or any idea how to do them but says he doesn't see anything wrong.

>>714062649
we're talking about the g2g tests
if same test results in 8ms for rog ally x using ips, and 33ms for switch 2 you can make a guess how the 2 panels perform
theres other testers obviously but their methodology is unknown and isn't directly comparable with monitors unboxed results, the quotes support MU tests unequivocally
>The Switch 2 (built-in display) has broken the worst record.
>In fast-moving scenes, the afterimage stretches out. Gamers looking for a competitive edge should use a gaming monitor in docked mode.
>Response speed is very slow
>To be honest , the "Switch 2 (main display)" is not great when viewed as a display alone
> The response time is also very slow (17 ms), and afterimages are very noticeable.

>>714057948 (OP)
>Steamies only have the screen to defend their trash
LMAO

>>714060695
The screen works at 120hz even if the signal isnt. Forcing it at 60hz is nonsense.

>>714064143
i think you misunderstand - currently only welcome tour, cyberpunk and street fighter 6 enable you to use 120hz at all. no other games will enable it and the screen defaults to 60hz with no option to force it to 120hz. even on an external display with 120hz support, 120hz mode is only used when a game signals it wants to use it. the system menus, the web browser, everything else is strictly 60hz.
the testers are not "forcing" it to 60hz, it is simply impossible to test it with your own arbitrary content like blur busters at 120hz. you sound aware of this yet you still seem indignant that people are testing 60hz mode, as if only half of your brain understands it.
they tested 60hz mode because they could not test 120hz mode. you could perhaps record welcome tour's single 120fps minigame with a capture card and play it back on an external display for a like for like comparison, but to display your own test images, you are forced to use 60hz.

>>714057948 (OP)

>>714064369
What does nintendo even gain locking the display fps options from the user?
Havent they seen steam deck?

Reminder Youtube is one of the switch apps that don't run properly on the Switch 2

>>714064369
>the testers are not "forcing" it to 60hz,
they are, the jewtube video testers end up with the screen downclocked to 60hz, which means it's just inherently slower to save battery
if it's still at 120hz but only displays 60 fps that's not downclocking, it does use more battery (which is part of the reason it only lasts 2 hours) but looks far better
games run on the latter mode, the jewtube app runs on the former

>>714064586
>free download
Rare from nintendo

>>714064604
>games run on the latter mode, the jewtube app runs on the former
do you have evidence of this?

>>714058017
And now your average reaction is 283ms late.

>>714064369
You are trying to explain this shit to literal children, they won't get it no matter how much you dumb it down.

>>714064604
>games run on the latter mode, the jewtube app runs on the former
Please explain why 60fps games would run in 120hz mode but not youtube.

>>714057948 (OP)
keep Smash 6 under 50ms of addition input delay and it will be the definitive best Smash Game.

>>714064649
>>714065079

>>714064586
>>714058280

>>714058017
Anything over 15ms is noticeable obviously so imagine how low you can go before it's barely noticeable.

>>714064630
Jewgle is unironically forced to, as having it as a paid "game" would mean they would not be allowed to have ads on it.

>>714065456
you didn't offer any explanation or counterargument. your source is just that you said the same thing earlier without evidence.
again, do you have proof that youtube reduces the refresh rate to 60hz, but other software doesn't?

>>714065456
You didn't explain anything.

>>714064491
>What does nintendo even gain locking the display fps options from the user?
More battery life

>>714058280
The 30fps line is what you want and the deck won for the TLDR

>>714057948 (OP)
No, it doesnt.
>b-but the sony shill sai-
and hed be wrong.
What >>714058280 said is the key here.

>>714065693
This source is the same as
>>714063440
That one btw

>deck shills still at it

>when I'm playing SF6 and my opponent's a Switch 2 user

>>714066060
What’s that even mean bro?

>>714066060
lol

>>714058323
This is a Nintendo thread, retard. Not a Sony one.

>all this arguing over numbers
I have a switch 2 and the screen is blurry as fuck while playing mario kart. You can literally use the blur as anti aliasing if you move the camera back and forth like TAA. Just admit that the screen response time sucks.

>>714057948 (OP)
The SSD is complete trash, and the CPU can't handle more than five NPCs in CP77.
That shit shouldn't cost more than $300.
If it weren't for Nvidia's DLSS, it would be one of the worst handhelds for the price.

>>714062649
>Nintendie retard doesn't understand G2G

>>714064391
>the only cope left

>>714064369
>they tested wrong but its ok i liked those wrong results more

You know this pisses tendies off because it can't be fixed with a simple software update and they already bought the system. When the eventual OLED version comes they will act high and mighty about it despite pretending not to care for the screen right now

>>714066620
nigger you can't even download youtube on the switch 2's eshop because the app isn't compatible (you have to download it on the switch 1 and then transfer it to the switch 2) and that's what these clickbait people are using for their tests

>>714066060
Ironically enough FGC niggers already said the games have less input lag on the switch 2 than the PiS5 they are being forced to use due to snoy buying EVO.

>>714066060
kek
Steamies would btfo tendies

>>714065693
>actual proper testing is already happening
take your bets on which tech eceleb is going to join the "nuked their credibility due to NDS" club alongside linus goy tips and sodomy foundry

>>714065693
A nintendo-funded source is debunking the anti-nintendo propaganda? Phew, looks like we're saved, nintensisters!

>>714066252
SSD?

>>714067340
Lolwut? What is this schizo talking about?

>>714066939
>Tendie thinks higher refresh rate will fix it and not exacerbate it

CRTs had 8ms of latency or less
display technology takes one step forward and 2 steps WAY back

>>714067421
crts had instant pixel response time
they're as far from switch 2 image quality wise as possible

>>714067421
Display technology is already at 1ms and less with oled
Nintendo cheapskate technology just found a way to save a few more bucks per unit on what's already the most profitable ecosystem out there

>>714065471
>Anything over 15ms is noticeable
Go ahead, faggot, prove it, I'll give you some leniency for muscle reaction, so try to get less than 100ms: https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime

>>714067519
the discussion is about image clarity

>>714067519
You never used a 240hz or faster oled and it shows

>>714057948 (OP)
Tendies are more than used to subpar hardware, games and services by now, who cares?

>>714067585
>>714067614
>Not posting score
That about sums it up.

>>714067710
when you move a camera with a mouse the screen has blur
fast enough pixel response time + more fps = less blur, eg you can read text easier on a moving target and the overall image is easier on the eyes

>>714067710
>Admitting you haven't seen a good monitor
That about sums it up

>>714067801
trying to explain pixel response times to a tendie is like trying to explain calculus to a dog

Pathetic how half the thread, both defending and attacking Nintendo, think that this means input lag and not screen blurriness. This board is a cesspool full of retards.

>>714065693
Seems about right, the fact hat retards here try to pretend they can even see this ghosting when the "reviews" have to intentionally zoom in and slowdown time says everything.

>>714067710
This thread isn't about latency you dumb fucking subhuman. Slow response time means that the previous image lingers for a long time, the result is blurriness. Nothing to do with input lag. Fucking moron.

>>714067801
>>714067821
>>714068135
Post screenshot, nigger.

>>714060705
Was it rape?

>>714068193
You're just embarrassing yourself here.

>>714068193

>>714068240
>>714068250
Literally all of them look blurry as fuck

Post screenshot, nigger.

>>714068134
>the fact hat retards here try to pretend they can even see this ghosting
Same site those numbers came from

>>714058280
In case people haven't noticed Sony and Microsoft has always used media and paid shills and beyond that literally all outlets now are desperate for views. The best ways to get views is to make DOOMED/CONTROVERSIAL videos. And that means if there is no controversial content to make they'll make shit up. I've used Switch 2 80-100 hours by now and haven't noticed any ghosting, any slowness whatsoever.

Do you think it was just an honest oversight?
like if the right person said "hey this is kinda ass" and they would've done something about it

they need to OD the display but what if its not possible with a firmware update, but they can do it for new units at the manufacturing stage, would they just keep selling the garbage screen to maintain parity with the early adopters?

>>714068489
>I've used Switch 2 80-100 hours by now and haven't noticed any ghosting, any slowness whatsoever.
That just means you're blind.

>>714058280
>NOOOOOOOO IT'S UNFAIR WHEN YOU COMPARE IT AT 60HZ AT A LINEUP WHERE... every monitor runs at 60hz...
do tendies really

>>714068529
It's deliberate. It's not just not ODing the screen, they are literally undervolting it. Such slow displays are not manufactured anymore. The reason is to increase battery life. Someone estimates this gives an extra 10-15 minutes battery life which apparently Nintendo thought was worth it. Probably because in heavy games otherwise they would have less than 2 hours battery.

>>714068456
So it's not 33ms, it's 17ms average (with whatever the fuck that blue line is supposed to represent when added to the black line, which is actually at like 8-something), OP was lying with numbers as usual.

>>714068529
>Do you think it was just an honest oversight?
of course not you fucking retard
nintendo is a billion dollar corporation, they analyzed their options and went with the cheapest, shittiest screen available that still allowed them to advertise "120hz" "HDR"

>>714068691
different testing
and the op testing is done by a way more experienced guy with way less lenient methods
so he's better

>>714068691
No. Different sources. Hardware Unboxed measured 33ms average, a Japanese site measures 17ms average. Both are horribly slow.

>>714068665
>give a menu option to the people that want it anyways and can afford battery packs
>everybody's happy

over the past few years i have been getting the very unsettling feeling that i am an exceptional, superior human being

>>714068801
>nintendo
>options
they want their customers to all be equally unhappy if you haven't caught up to their MO yet

>>714068734
>is done by a way more experienced guy with way less lenient methods
Source for this? Why should I trust neckbeard A over B?

>>714068743
>Both are horribly slow.
17ms is far better than 33ms, try to be a bit less disingenuous.

>>714068801
This is Nintendo. Won't happen.

>>714068691
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKFYGv0Pb98
this video explains a bit why other tests have different results

>>714068134
It’s likely more accurate but you can still see the ghosting at that response time

>>714068853
because the neckbeard A has a youtube channel where he tested hundreds of monitors?

>>714068665
>they are literally undervolting it.
though a buggy jewgle app that isn't even technically downloadable on the switch 2
in actual real use the screen is fine >>714058280

>>714068871
>>714068892
>Faggotuber
Yep, opinion discarded

>>714068529
It's obviously something variable and the Switch 2 is going to allocate more power when in a game than it is for watching youtube or using the home screen
These tests are comparing apples to oranges and we're not going to see what the switch 2 is actually like until someone hacks it

>>714068991
>the Switch 2 is going to allocate more power when in a game than it is for watching youtube
Source?

The funniest part is that the LCD Steam Deck has the same response time yet nobody gave a fuck ever.

>>714068947
>i'd rather trust a random guy than someone with fuckloads of experience and lesser conflict of interests because i hate that result less

>>714068892
Wouldn't even be the first eceleb to nuke their credibility just to take a jab at nintendo over the switch 2.
Somehow it wouldn't even be the 5th.

>>714069048
the lcd steam deck was the first foray into handhelds of a software centric company
nintendo has done this shit for thirty years

>>714069081
Who cares about "nuking their credibility" among tendie manchildren?

>>714069081
>everyone is wrong, you should give the only console that reaps massive profit from selling consoles an unreasonable benefit of the doubt

>>714069052
Yes, I'd rather trust the guy that has nothing to win from doing a clickbaity video to attract views, faggotubers are known to lie and exaggerate their reports to earn views, they're also known to happily engage in drama because all of this improves their visibility.

Faggotubers are inherently less genuine than your average tech neckbeard.

>>714069202
that most of the westoidese speaking world mutilates the dicks of males at birth doesn't mean it's correct to do so

>>714069107
>it's okay when valve does it

>>714069043

>>714063440
>playing competitive shit on a nintendo
This is where you fags lost the plot. Anyone playing competitive games is on pc. Anyone who wants to bing bing wahoo gets a nintendo. Two completely different worlds. Thats why the switch 2 sold 3.5 million units in 4 days and you are here coping about 19 more ms delay than a esport panel on a fucking handheld hybrid system

>>714069251
yeah, people are way less forgiving when it's your first ever handheld than when you've done eight of them over thirty years not counting refreshes

>>714069365
technically not even true when their VR screen was far better than the goydeck one

>>714068838
>>714068854
I'm well aware, I find it funny how simple the solutions to their bad pr are. The mario kart situation is so retarded, just shooting themselves in the foot for no benefit

The switch 2 is a TOY made for CHILDREN, retard kids unironically won't notice that nintendo cheaped out on some hardware specs.

>>714069236
>his fav corpo is offended and his mind goes to dicks
the same mentality that enables circumcision also enables nintendo giving you subpar shit that they sell at a massive profit

>>714069107
Thanks for proving the point, slave.

>>714069468
>their bad pr
At this point around 90% of said bad PR are outright lies like the switch 2 not coming with a dock included or requiring vita style proprietary SD cards or game keys requiring a constant internet connection like denuvo even after installing and updating the game.

>>714057948 (OP)
>33ms
>33
I HATE THE FUCKING ANTICHRIST

>>714069578
>slave
you can't use a browser on your toy
you can't play romhacks
you need to pay to emulate old games you own

what i dont get is why the switch 2 is so large when its intended for baby boy hands? you would think they'd make it a little less unwieldly and release an xl version later for big people. it also feels way too "nice" for a toy a bouncing boy is gonna drop and fuck up

>>714069806
What's your weird obsession with "baby boys"?

>>714069594
https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/707536206/
Please don't remind me of that retardation.

>>714069652
What a weird, irrelevant come back... slave.

>>714069929
>>714069594
https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/707269287/
Clearly I'm more retarded because I posted the wrong one.

>>714069942
>i only want to play games how my masters want me to and everything else is irrelevant
you're in no position to project slavery

>>714069891
you are projecting onto me, i was just using illustrating words and apparently im in the wrong for it

>>714070031
More weird nonsense. Is it rage or stupidity? Nobody cares.

>>714070107
i accept your concession at this point
consolecuckery is slavery no matter how much you cope

>>714057948 (OP)
I didn't notice any difference. Screen is still better than the steam deck OLED. Cope more steamies.

>>714058017
the average is like 130 grandpa

>>714070438
>a slow ips is better than oled
a statement that can only be dreamed up by the most mentally deranged(tendies)

>>714070494
OLED is a meme, that's why the Switch 2 sold more in a day than the Deck OLED's entire lifetime sale LMAO.
This is one fact that steamies can never refute.

>>714058017
>humans can only see 4 fps

>>714070494
>>714058280

>>714070082
>i was just using illustrating words
Repeatedly and unprovoked. Frequently called obsession.

>>714070564
okay that's just fucking sad, even poorfag phones have oled now
get well soon!

>>714069364
This. Tendies have no standards so I don't blane nintendo for pulling this off. They know their fanbase.

>>714070649
>/v/ tendies are unashamedly quoting karma farming reddit tendies as to why the screen doesn't suck
and the best part? that's not oled you're comparing it to

>>714070841
thats still far less delay than the original 33ms delay claim anon, you are admitting to spreading misinfo either way

>>714071031
>spreading misinfo
you're the one that replied to me calling out someone being demented enough to call a slow as shit ips panel better than oled
also if we're going with your gay ad hominem measuring stick, i'd rather trust the info of youtubers than random redditor tendies posting this on the tendie reddit page

>>714071138
>i'd rather trust the info of youtubers
so you believed digital sodomy when they claimed to have insider info about a switch 1 pro back in the day?

>>714071209
no, i don't give a shit about prerelease rumors
tendies do
remember how tendies spammed that one cyberpunk picture from actual NINTENDO APPROVED trailer and then it got btfo?
i'd rather trust an autistic monitor pro guy doing a proper ghosting test than a karma farming tendie in his echochamber

>>714071378
>doing a proper ghosting test
It's not tho, people doing the same testing are already coming up with better numbers than when he tested it through a buggy jewgle app.

>>714071378
>I'd rather trust a steam deck shill than objective tests run by actual testers.

>>714071465
>the same testing
but it's not?

>>714071507
>objective tests run by actual testers.
>tendie redditors
fucking lmao

>>714064391
Yeah, you really have to nitpick to see the screen blur.
Here's a 2d game I'm playing on SW2.
Do you see anything thats not ghosting? And this game isnt that fast btw

>>714058280
spbp
It's getting really tiresome to deal with so much disinformation at every console launch now.

>>714058280
>Skip to 3:50.
>Not only the nigger is comparing it to 144-520hz high end monitors (granted, most are 144-165hz), he's also comparing them with the switch 2 at 60hz.
they're all at 60 you fucking dunce
you want nintendo to have preferential treatment?

>>714071786
>you want nintendo to have preferential treatment?
You're asking a tendie that?

>>714071581
>>tendie redditors
They don't get paid by Valve to badmouth Nintendo on videos.

>>714071786
also
>How was this done you ask? By comparing the pixel movement through an ufo test video.
read the fucking headline of those numbers
grey to grey
do you see any fucking grey in the ufo test?
no, because it's something completely different

>>714068574
If all else fails, resort to gaslighting.
>don’t trust your lying eyes!!

>>714060790
The screen is incredibly thin compared to the switch 1, it makes it harder to have a low response time because it needs to have custom circuitry which is more inefficient. The screen has a built in optimizer though that causes it to appear to have 10ms or less delay though by predicting where the pixels will appear but this doesn't show up on YouTube. The only way you can really test it is a slow motion camera.

>>714072267
here tendies, i even made you a quick grey to grey test just to see how fucking easy it is and how delusional you are

>PC trannies suddenly care about input lag
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqMqeuwxwVg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqMqeuwxwVg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqMqeuwxwVg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqMqeuwxwVg

>>714073175
I doubt any delay matters in that piece of shit with its """realistic" slow swimming in water ass moment. Same shitty moment in GTA 5. Like turning a fucking boat.

>>714073175
these are completely different things you illiterate nintrannoid

>>714071656
I wonder if GBA and Genesis games that relied on ghosting for false transparency benefit from this aah goofy screen

Who cares?

It's in portable mode.
Portable is always a compromised way to play a game.

>>714073537
LOL NO
What about the switch oled. It has a 0.1 ms response.

>>714073514
Gba didn't support transparency normally?

>>714073537
>compromised screen
>compromised controllers
>compromised battery life
>compromised performance
>uncompromised price

>>714073497
No, it's not but keep seething, tranny

>>714073595
He's right desu. And it's barely noticable. If it's a huge issue for you you can just wait to buy it or buy a new one when the OLED comes out. A lot of people play handheld yeah but those people will guarantee you not notice it and I also guarantee you Nintendo tested it with a large group of people. If the people that cared weren't in a huge minority they wouldn't have done it. Also doesn't having 4k support when it's docked and a fan in the dock for increased performance balance it out? I dunno I love my switch 2 is probably my favorite console ever next to the GBA sp maybe ds lite

>>714073653
yes they are you subnormal tendoid
if a screen can't get sub 33ms response times anything above 30hz is wasted on it

>>714073628
>>714073595
>>714073497
>>714073121
>>714073827

You lost, eric

>>714073827
Your woke tranny slop can't get 200ms response times on any screen neither, keep seething, tranny

>>714074054
if screen response times were synonymous with human reaction times and input lag we'd all be playing games at sub 10 fps and anything above would be wasted
you're a moron

>>714074214
peak reddit moment

>>714074270
yeah, for you getting karma on the nintendo subreddit for coping this hard

>>714074305
Eric, your article is literally redit slop.
But nice upvotes there ;)

>>714074385
>Searching for posts that contain ‘eric’ and posts after 2025-03-01 and posts before 2025-06-30.
>Returning only first 3000 of 5050 results found.

>>714074636
I accept your troonycession, Eric

>>714058280
>tendie keeps reposting his copypasta regardless of how many times it gets disproven
actual fucking cult giving away fliers

>>714075702
See >>714074790
Your Zelda seethe thread died after 5 hours of page 10 bumping, Eric

>>714075965
take your meds
you're a minority here now, its a free republic of pc, not a slave driving shogunate of nintendo

>>714057948 (OP)
Whether its 1ms, 33ms or 950ms: you're stil paying a hefty premium to "buy" crippleware (i.e.: rent it until your access gets revoked for wrongthink).

>>714076496
Eric, your retarded cope flopped ;)

>>714076738
that has always been the console standard, slavery as the baseline
at least other consolecucks get a discount on their shackles, Nintendo demands a premium on them

>>714062196
3DS had nintendo mixing TN and IPS screens, and the switch also had both decent and bad screen. Screen lottery is a thing with Nintedo. And wait till you zoomers learn about the first gen GBA, you could not see shit as it had no backlight.

>>714072296
Yeah I'm sure half a dozen professional tests from outfits that have been around for 10+ years are less reliable than your testimony anon. Thanks for correcting the record.

>>714077124
>>714079312
Eric, you lost

>33ms delay
>On a physical device you hold in your hands
I get less delay connecting to a server in a different country when playing WoW on a private server. You people pay money for this shit?