Search Results
6/20/2025, 11:22:36 AM
>>95910577
The Habsburgs are still around, so are the Bourbons. Heck, the daughter of Louis XVI actually survived the Revolution.
Neither the chop-chop of Louis XIV and Marie Antoinette or the extinction of the Romanovs ended the civil war in the country they used to rule, btw. There is never an excuse for semi-legal murder.
The Habsburgs are still around, so are the Bourbons. Heck, the daughter of Louis XVI actually survived the Revolution.
Neither the chop-chop of Louis XIV and Marie Antoinette or the extinction of the Romanovs ended the civil war in the country they used to rule, btw. There is never an excuse for semi-legal murder.
6/12/2025, 1:28:16 PM
>>148980477
>This is like if Bob Moog sued the entire music industry for infringing on his total monopoly on synthesizer-produced sounds.
Fixed.
Like he could've made a business of renting out his machines and explicitly taking a cut from anything produced using them, yes. That would've been legal, that's how the business side of Social Media works. It's great money if you can enforce your monopoly.
But to elaborate on it, a synthesizer uses specific technical solutions to simulate the operations of distinct tools. The patent is on the technological solution and the complete description of its operation. The Synth's operation does not require instruments to exist. Instead, it references physical instruments through a novel technical application.
The LLM is a database application that produces digital data. It requires actual, existent digital data to start its operation and it's literally being rated on how well it can imitate any specific digital data it's been trained on. Flowers without dog faces and all that.
In the first place, going from digital data to similar, but somewhat randomized digital data is a way smaller transformation than going from a physical flute to a machine that can make you electronically imitate a flute ensemble. The flute itself can never be an ensemble.
It's also a smaller transformation than going from publishing a book to running a system that allows people to find foot note references in all publications of the last hundred years. The book itself can't be that electronic reference system, not even if you digitize it.
But your digital database application that generate slightly randomized, but still high fidelity outputs of its digital reference materials as digital outputs does none of that. It's a machine that literally just infringes on digital copyright.
>This is like if Bob Moog sued the entire music industry for infringing on his total monopoly on synthesizer-produced sounds.
Fixed.
Like he could've made a business of renting out his machines and explicitly taking a cut from anything produced using them, yes. That would've been legal, that's how the business side of Social Media works. It's great money if you can enforce your monopoly.
But to elaborate on it, a synthesizer uses specific technical solutions to simulate the operations of distinct tools. The patent is on the technological solution and the complete description of its operation. The Synth's operation does not require instruments to exist. Instead, it references physical instruments through a novel technical application.
The LLM is a database application that produces digital data. It requires actual, existent digital data to start its operation and it's literally being rated on how well it can imitate any specific digital data it's been trained on. Flowers without dog faces and all that.
In the first place, going from digital data to similar, but somewhat randomized digital data is a way smaller transformation than going from a physical flute to a machine that can make you electronically imitate a flute ensemble. The flute itself can never be an ensemble.
It's also a smaller transformation than going from publishing a book to running a system that allows people to find foot note references in all publications of the last hundred years. The book itself can't be that electronic reference system, not even if you digitize it.
But your digital database application that generate slightly randomized, but still high fidelity outputs of its digital reference materials as digital outputs does none of that. It's a machine that literally just infringes on digital copyright.
Page 1