>>34105737
People have said it was dead at every number of users, so I'm not sure what that means anymore. But what it means when the number of active users remains fixed isn't that nobody's signing up. Rather it means that people are joining at *the same rate* as they're leaving (or being marked inactive). A few hundred people sign up per day, and I think the vast majority come from /soc/

The fact a big proportion of sign-ups come from a single /soc/ thread is evidence that the number of active users can almost be doubled by shilling duolicious on just one other imageboard/forum/etc. I don't know of any 4chan-adjacent boards to do that on though. Maybe other anons do. Please don't send 100k people in a few days again. That was stressful

>>34104751
Thanks. I hadn't thought about that aspect of the experience for bisexual people

>>34104587
Does the Earth attract the sun, or the sun attract the Earth? Unfortunately, people will never stop using dating apps, so companies will never stop running them

>>34104572
The match percentage can't go up to 100% because the number is meant to account for uncertainty. And also the algorithm doesn't know it's comparing a person to themselves - It just sees the questions/answers and pumps out a number accordingly

>>34099923
>in surprised that government's of the world haven't actually completely banned them yet
Japan has a government-run dating app, Tokyo Enmusubi