>>717095876
Like it's literally all just convenient nonsense arguments in their head for why hypothetically if mastercard / Visa did something highly illegal they would actually face zero consequences while steam would be INSTANTLY CRUSHED or whatever
>Even if they did comply with the orders they got they could still be banned for not complying!
>And they would instantly go bankrupt!
>Don't even try a lawsuit, it simply doesn't work!
>They couldn't, they would lose all their money!
Meanwhile they didn't try, they didn't do anything at all, Valve sat by and just let gamers do all the work, and then people made up stories in their head to justify said behavior. It's literally all stories they're making up of why lawsuits don't work and never had, which just shows it's absolute nonsense because lawsuits happen every single day, and many of them against banks and payment processors.
>>717096138
Look at this, it's literally all non-arguments. It's completely meaningless.