Search Results
6/28/2025, 5:18:46 AM
>>713859358
>Videogames and software that specifically are not tied to a susbcription service to function are considered goods, not services.
Can you do more than just parrot the same tired and defeated argument? No, they aren't considered services, but it's still just a license, you don't have creative control over it.
>They are covered and protected by the same laws and regulations as physical goods
No, no they aren't.
In fact different goods have different laws and regulations. For example, plants require passports as part of a preventative measure against pests and disease but something like a graphics card wouldn't need something like that.
"Goods" isn't just one massive thing with a generic set of rules and regulations. It's all specific and copyright just so happens to be the one that covers video games and all entertainment media being the reason they're sold as licences.
>just facts.
No, none of the pro SKG arguments are factual. They're vague statements made by the ignorant.
>Then why are you against this again?
It's almost as if I have a vested interest in video games and don't want some shitheels in Northern and Eastern Europe to fucking ruin them because they can't help but get on their knees for a company and suck their cock instead of just not buying the fucking game they have a problem with.
>Videogames and software that specifically are not tied to a susbcription service to function are considered goods, not services.
Can you do more than just parrot the same tired and defeated argument? No, they aren't considered services, but it's still just a license, you don't have creative control over it.
>They are covered and protected by the same laws and regulations as physical goods
No, no they aren't.
In fact different goods have different laws and regulations. For example, plants require passports as part of a preventative measure against pests and disease but something like a graphics card wouldn't need something like that.
"Goods" isn't just one massive thing with a generic set of rules and regulations. It's all specific and copyright just so happens to be the one that covers video games and all entertainment media being the reason they're sold as licences.
>just facts.
No, none of the pro SKG arguments are factual. They're vague statements made by the ignorant.
>Then why are you against this again?
It's almost as if I have a vested interest in video games and don't want some shitheels in Northern and Eastern Europe to fucking ruin them because they can't help but get on their knees for a company and suck their cock instead of just not buying the fucking game they have a problem with.
Page 1