>>280173294
3/10
2 points for art 1 for the ""potential"" the story had. in regards to what i dislike about the story and my reasoning for giving it a low score
>author's pets get immunity with the story bending over backwards to cater to them. consequences for their actions don't matter wrong things they did are never brought up and everyone conveniently ignores their flaws.
>lots of retcons or badly set up story beats, the story eventually devolves into events happening on a whim, with little regard for consistency, setup, or explanation.
>all the villains are a joke, consistently outmatched by the protagonists in ways that feels unearned and unengaging. whenever the villan has the upper hand and can kill an important character he conveniently doesn't, until the hero conveniently gets away or worse yet the villan bruises the hero a bit before letting him go.
>the story overall is incoherent and has no point or central message it tells, half of the plot points appear towards the end haphazardly with little to no set up
>some of the character interactions are downright cancer inducing with the author clearly trying to establish a specific dynamic or emotional tone without earning it through proper development. worse yet no one instory acknowledges this so you're stuck reading shit like bakek treating dekek like utter garbage with deku saying shit like "haha that's my best pal <3" with everyone else saying that they're nice friends including the teachers not acknowledging or doing anything about it, the author wants you to believe they're rivals but they act like badly written mentally ill domestically abusive couple. the disconnect between what’s shown and what the story insists we feel is jarring, and it’s never meaningfully addressed.
>adding to the point above, it's not just dekuk and bakek even if they're the most egregious example because of their extensive screen time, it's most of the characters in the story with few exceptions.