>>40501758
>see little lights moving in the sky
>blindly believe the fictional stories you’re told to believe about them

Try actually looking into the methodology being used for once. It’s always just one pseudoscientific assumption piled upon another. For example:

https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40223306/#40229354
>Parallax is provably bs pseudoscience which makes the assumption that the earth is moving and not the object being studied, despite the fact that earth’s motions have never been measured. Also, the measurements claimed to be made using parallax are literally smaller than what standard atmospheric refraction would account for. Also look into negative parallax bc most parallax measurements show the exact opposite of what the heliocentric model predicts. Stop being so gullible and automatically believing what youre told to believe. one of your perceived authority figures told you a word “parallax”, and you never even bothered to look into the actual measurements being claimed, you just believed what you were told to believe about the new word you learned. Invest the time and educate yourself for once:

>STELLAR PARALLAX / ABERRATION:

>Space Audits #12: Stellar Parallax Explained:
https://youtu.be/QvBQA5syuqk

>Arcseconds, Triangles, Stellar Parallax (Space Audits upload):
https://youtu.be/3eArkUlcnWg

>Clip: Geocentric vs Heliocentric Parallax Angle Predictions (Space Audits upload):
https://youtu.be/AjGF7K3tEPA

>Potential Explanations For Stellar Parallax & Stellar Aberration (Space Audits upload):
https://youtu.be/5KDc4PMZQfE

>Clips: Airy's Success and Negative Parallax (Space Audits upload):
https://youtu.be/yCqnqYBIWhs

>Spectroscopy
>It’s meme and again pseudoscience by definition. Try looking at your shoe and see if you can deduce what materials your shoe is made of using spectroscopy lol

You have no idea how much bullshit your religion is based in, and unfortunately due to the powerful effect of cogdis, you probably never will.