>>11315855
I think there were some tribes that were matriarchal, it does seem that it cannot exist at a societal scale because to be feminine is to be social and society basically requires sociopaths at the helm else it goes nowhere.
Like with tribes, a family can be matriarchal, is that sexy? IDK, why do guys have oedipal complexes?

If we assume that you have a large system led in a feminine way, it could be world comprised of cultural tribes sub-cultures lead by women that govern the fabric of the society while the society itself is organised in a utilitarian way
So you'd have cabals of women chatting about culture which they then manifest in the form of getting celebrities to show off their culture like some public form of pageant show. Because it's a competition between groups, and each group is selecting their best to put on the public stage, it then becomes a game of eugenics (like the women who get really into dog breeding). Most men would just be workers, non-reproductive but enjoy the company of women socially. There's no porn, so dudes aren't as sex crazed and they undergo socialisation through the tribal system that has them all effectively act like the gay best friend (if you want it extreme, you could have them be castrated). Then there would be the seeders, which are men used just because of their strong lineage and compatibility to specific women who are too considered good stock. Because they are of higher prestige, the breeding women, they would be given authority to do with the seeding males whatever they wished.
Basically it's Bene Gesserit breeding programs, but more overt. A managerial class that you know values your breeding potential before your labor

The end result is women with hypersexualised bodies