>>24531901
Why are you asking me for arguments when the post I'm responding to doesn't offer any? I've already provided enough, so let me repeat it clearly: Claiming that it's unfair to compare the right to bear arms at its best with freedom of speech at its worst is not a counter to what I've said, especially when you can't even provide examples of freedom of speech at its best. I believe cultures should derive utility from the principles they hold dear, that is my internal logic you have not addressed despite your claims to the contrary, even when the other post admits to understand as much. No, claiming that freedom of speech is an axiomatic principle that must simply be adhered to doesn't refute my claims, it only demonstrates that your pov rests on arbitrary and unjustified assumptions.
My original argument is not undermined, so far as this conversation goes it is completely unchallenged, further proof: >>24531903
>>24531914
>You are a literal golem
This is rich coming from the same clique that claims that everything that comes out of here and paints you in a bad light is actually the work of some conspiring European ethnicity maliciously controlling everything and everyone from the shadows. If the common narrative oozing from 4chan to the rest of the internet is anywhere close to the truth, the title of "golem" better describes you and your hivemind of die hard free speech defenders, upholders of lofty ideals such as pedophile representations in media, parasocial relationships with a dime a dozen jewish profiteers/fictional women/literal objects, nasty pornography and of course the nigger word that after enough repetitions will save the white race, just to name the greatest hits.