>I almost felt the winner of Raducanu-Sabalenka could be the winner of the title because the quality of the tennis was some of the best we have seen in the women's tournament.
Hmm, so the fact that Sabs almost lost against a ranked 107 and was broken numerous times and is playing shit means she or Raducanu were possibly THE players to win the title? Sure iI suppose WTA is complete garbage and it is Wimbledon - the WTA tournament for shitters. But to say the quality of tennis ws high -was it really?