>>24499383
there's a problem with this line of phenomenological line of thinking: you have to account for all the things you know that you don't actually know yet (both phenomenally (empirically (sensually)) and noumenally (a priori & a posteriori reasoning (noetically)). So you have to account yourself epistemically in space and time at different points/wills of yourselves(s): for example, the version of you from when you were a kid and the one you are in the present and the most probable versions of your will in a few moments from now.
like most people from his time; Kant missed the Meta on how to "Think like God".
Kierkegaard was closer in this regaard.