Search Results
6/28/2025, 8:27:37 PM
>>81647334
>maybe some take it easy anon will visit u
I should be so lucky. I can wait though, I'm not desperate to go or anything. I can die knowing I've never been to Disneyland.
>>81647589
>Motocycle club?
You shouldn't operate vehicles when you're sleepy.
>>81647845
>I mean duh, what else were they expecting to see?
It is obvious but I think in the current climate of AI hype, far too many stakeholders (and just regular people) have bought into the hype and need to be told incredibly obvious things before they do something stupid. Sometimes it has to be dressed up in a weird brain wave study to make it more palatable to them.
>I really don't get why they chose to go with such topics instead of specific subjects that require actual preparation
My best guess is that's it's easier to find participants for that. I'd be interested if there'd be any differences if it was on some kind of specialist knowledge.
I'd like to see a long-term study to see the effects over e.g., a year but I'm not sure how you'd do that or get ethics approval for diet-lobotomising people.
>give it to people who can understand and make use of its potential and it can become a very powerful tool
>since the average person has room temperature IQ, so imagine when the average starts to go even lower because people can't think for themselves anymore...
I'm about 50 papers deep now and am thoroughly blackpilled at this point. Quite a few talk about the benefits of chatbots if they're used properly but I get the feeling that the percentage of people actually doing that is pretty low, at least from lay-men I've interacted with. By that I mean a taxi driver one time.
One finding in a different paper that jumped out to me was that people who benefitted most from AI (productivity/test score-wise) tended to score lower in executive function. I do worry that we'll end up with an underclass of people who can only proompt and not much else. For my sake I hope I'm just being an alarmist.
>maybe some take it easy anon will visit u
I should be so lucky. I can wait though, I'm not desperate to go or anything. I can die knowing I've never been to Disneyland.
>>81647589
>Motocycle club?
You shouldn't operate vehicles when you're sleepy.
>>81647845
>I mean duh, what else were they expecting to see?
It is obvious but I think in the current climate of AI hype, far too many stakeholders (and just regular people) have bought into the hype and need to be told incredibly obvious things before they do something stupid. Sometimes it has to be dressed up in a weird brain wave study to make it more palatable to them.
>I really don't get why they chose to go with such topics instead of specific subjects that require actual preparation
My best guess is that's it's easier to find participants for that. I'd be interested if there'd be any differences if it was on some kind of specialist knowledge.
I'd like to see a long-term study to see the effects over e.g., a year but I'm not sure how you'd do that or get ethics approval for diet-lobotomising people.
>give it to people who can understand and make use of its potential and it can become a very powerful tool
>since the average person has room temperature IQ, so imagine when the average starts to go even lower because people can't think for themselves anymore...
I'm about 50 papers deep now and am thoroughly blackpilled at this point. Quite a few talk about the benefits of chatbots if they're used properly but I get the feeling that the percentage of people actually doing that is pretty low, at least from lay-men I've interacted with. By that I mean a taxi driver one time.
One finding in a different paper that jumped out to me was that people who benefitted most from AI (productivity/test score-wise) tended to score lower in executive function. I do worry that we'll end up with an underclass of people who can only proompt and not much else. For my sake I hope I'm just being an alarmist.
Page 1