>>57955247
You're missing my point anon. I'm not saying that human X Pokémon isn't brought up at all. I'm saying that all instances of it, point to the franchise not portraying it as something we should see positively.

Also remember some Pokémon are just more affectionate than others, which must be factored in to determine if they're truly into humans romantically. It goes back to gif posted earlier in this thread with Brock and Ninetails.

>>57955314
OP is making an totally off-topic thread for this board. Even if this thread didn't get deleted, or rather not yet, at least now it's more about Pokémon.
>I guess palworld is part of Pokémon now
In a way, because most talk I see of Palworld generally involves its relation to Pokémon.
>Tbh this board could be reworked to be about monster collectors in general,
If that happened then as you say:
>90% of topics would still be Pokémon related
The very reason this board is a thing. Pokémon is the biggest monster franchise and a very massive franchise overall compared to other franchises. so makes sense why that'd be the case.