Search Results
7/21/2025, 3:31:08 PM
>>510960662
>How is Russia going to prepare for war with NATO/Europe?
It’s already at war with NATO/Europe via the Ukrainian conflict. No matter how that war ends, it’s going to lead to more serious conflicts down the road. The goal of arming Ukraine with sophisticated weaponry and prolonging the war is to weaken Russia in the long term. This has worked in a sense if we take the number of casualties into account. I’ve seen numbers in the millions and also far less. It’s hard to say what is and isn’t bullshit. From another perspective, it has strengthened Russia’s industrial base as they’ve reinvigorated their industrial infrastructure for war, which isn’t good for NATO. No one will call it WW3 until the chess game in Ukraine ends - it’s a cork holding back the immense pressure of full scale global war involving major powers. Iran and China will support Russia. None of us really know what this war will look like. What kind of weapons would be implemented? What about nuclear deterrence? I think for the first time since Pearl Harbor, the US could see bombs fall on its soil (9/11 doesn’t count because it was blatantly an inside job perpetrated by the Zionist deep state). We all live under the shield of nuclear deterrence and it makes us feel “safe”, but what if a nation is secretly in possession of something - perhaps a weapon - that renders deterrence obsolete. Why would super powers inch closer to global war if it means everyone loses in the end via nuclear Armageddon? It doesn’t add up.
>How is Russia going to prepare for war with NATO/Europe?
It’s already at war with NATO/Europe via the Ukrainian conflict. No matter how that war ends, it’s going to lead to more serious conflicts down the road. The goal of arming Ukraine with sophisticated weaponry and prolonging the war is to weaken Russia in the long term. This has worked in a sense if we take the number of casualties into account. I’ve seen numbers in the millions and also far less. It’s hard to say what is and isn’t bullshit. From another perspective, it has strengthened Russia’s industrial base as they’ve reinvigorated their industrial infrastructure for war, which isn’t good for NATO. No one will call it WW3 until the chess game in Ukraine ends - it’s a cork holding back the immense pressure of full scale global war involving major powers. Iran and China will support Russia. None of us really know what this war will look like. What kind of weapons would be implemented? What about nuclear deterrence? I think for the first time since Pearl Harbor, the US could see bombs fall on its soil (9/11 doesn’t count because it was blatantly an inside job perpetrated by the Zionist deep state). We all live under the shield of nuclear deterrence and it makes us feel “safe”, but what if a nation is secretly in possession of something - perhaps a weapon - that renders deterrence obsolete. Why would super powers inch closer to global war if it means everyone loses in the end via nuclear Armageddon? It doesn’t add up.
Page 1