>>509869837
>Protecting people doesn't need to be right
i agree, that's my point.
under a godless materialistic worldview, butt-raping someone or protecting them are morally equivalent, since morals can't be real.
>it creates a stable environment that benefits you.
and what about when it doesn't?
if consequences dictate a course of action then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught.