Search Results
6/22/2025, 3:58:20 AM
>>23337245
Djibril's orders sound less like directly targeting ZAFT and more like sending the Destroy, thinking it unstoppable, to obliterate anything in its path: both ZAFT forces and Eurasian civilians.
In other words, the civilian deaths aren't "collateral damage", but part of the operation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateral_damage
>any incidental and undesired death, injury or other damage inflicted, especially on civilians, as the result of an activity
>Collateral damage does not include civilian casualties caused by military operations that are intended to terrorize or kill enemy civilians (e.g., the bombing of Chongqing during World War II and Russian strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure openly described as "retaliatory" and intended to "make towns uninhabitable")
The latter description fits Djibril's description of the Destroy's deployment very well. Remember he's absolutely seething at Eurasians siding with ZAFT.
Djibril's orders sound less like directly targeting ZAFT and more like sending the Destroy, thinking it unstoppable, to obliterate anything in its path: both ZAFT forces and Eurasian civilians.
In other words, the civilian deaths aren't "collateral damage", but part of the operation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateral_damage
>any incidental and undesired death, injury or other damage inflicted, especially on civilians, as the result of an activity
>Collateral damage does not include civilian casualties caused by military operations that are intended to terrorize or kill enemy civilians (e.g., the bombing of Chongqing during World War II and Russian strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure openly described as "retaliatory" and intended to "make towns uninhabitable")
The latter description fits Djibril's description of the Destroy's deployment very well. Remember he's absolutely seething at Eurasians siding with ZAFT.
Page 1