>

>>106137006
I'm going to repeat my post because no one _EVER_ responds to something that is not a last post here. And I want a response:

>>106136859
One critical thing is to get young naiieve white-boi programmers to program some honest stuff while you can still maliciously trick them into doing it.

I got Divverent (Rudolf Polzer) to code in cryptographic networking into Nexuiz because he was a university student.
I asked him to do it, talked with him on IRC every night, forever, and I also sent cash over to Germany for him, my whole check, for quite awhile.

I said to him I wanted this feature so people could plot to overthrow governments over Nexuiz.

Since he was a young naiieve white-boi he did the work.
He has since said he wish he never met me, and wishes he could take back all the work he did.

He works for google now. His fellow googler, Lord, Forest Hale, Havoc, "became" a woman and chopped his own dick and balls off to become "Lady Havoc".
They all support feminism now.
Back then they didn't quite.

The real reason ReiserFS was removed from the linux kernel is to distance Linux from Hackers: who are often anti-feminist, always are "mmallleee", and do not give credit to women.

Hackers built Linux and Linus asked for their help in 1993. Which they gave.
Now he has stolen their code and stolen their honour.

And he needs to be killed for this.

The real reason ReiserFS was removed from the linux kernel is to distance Linux from Hackers: who are often anti-feminist, always are "mmallleee", and do not give credit to women.

Hackers built Linux and Linus asked for their help in 1993. Which they gave.
Now he has stolen their code and stolen their honour.

And he needs to be killed for this.

They're fun hacker languages.
White people like Brian Lunduke seethe about them and say all pedos should die.
They hate Richard Matthew Stallman.
Same reason they hate C.
>>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>>
>>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>>
>>--------------------------
>>
>>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>>
>>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>>
>>--------------------------
>>
>>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>>
>>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>>
>>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia