>>23352432
>for zeroing in on the Trade Federation vs. Naboo being an "uncompelling conflict" when that's not the central conflict
The initial point, which you jumped in to contest, was that the trade disputes and senatorial politics were not compelling. That was the sole thing said. And your response was, "well I found them compelling, you were just too dumb to understand why they're bad". So clearly, you thought it was a point worth fucking talking about, dumbass