>>40252800
Anonnnn if you really can’t see what’s wrong with your syllogism you are just as dumb as /tttt/. I am begging you. :(

Hint: the problem is that you’ve said A=B, when you really mean A is *part of* B. This is why you can’t use the transitive property to make A=C. Your fruit bat example is just true by coincidence, not by proof.