From a Freudian psychoanalytic perspective, the Christian subject who derives a perverse gratification from the humiliation rituals imposed by foreign occupiers presents a complex fusion of Thanatos and Eros—death drive and libidinal submission—channeled through the culturally sanctioned framework of Christian martyrdom and guilt. The occupying force, symbolic of the superego externalized—stern, alien, and commanding—enacts a series of symbolic castrations upon the subject: national, spiritual, bodily. Yet rather than resist, the Christian embraces this abasement as if it were divine judgment, collapsing political subjugation into a metaphysical narrative of redemptive suffering. Their masochism is not passive but ecstatic, a libidinal economy in which degradation becomes a currency of spiritual worth. This self-abnegation parallels the crucified Christ—humiliated, pierced, exalted—and yet the subject's unconscious transforms this identification into something darker and more erotic. Here Nietzsche’s insight into ressentiment becomes vital: the weak, unable to overthrow their oppressors, invert moral values and glorify their own suffering. They turn defeat into virtue, humiliation into sacred ritual. But Freud would point to the repressed desire underneath—an infantile longing to return to the father’s law, even if that father is cruel and foreign. The Christian, in this perverse formulation, reenacts the trauma of original sin and patriarchal domination, converting the spectacle of submission into a perverse jouissance. Their pleasure is not in freedom but in being seen—naked, weeping, devout—by the Other who punishes. Their faith becomes a theater of sublimated eroticism, where the lash of the occupier echoes both divine wrath and unconscious longing. It is not merely God they seek to please, but the faceless superego of power itself, before whom they kneel with trembling delight.
Is this conversation helpful so far?