>>212058115
>It's the land our people conquered and colonized, yes.
Just like talking to a fucking wall. You don't even get the irony or the hypocrisy of what you're saying
>Because I like living in a white country, around white people, and like how white countries are. The only two parts of the world that can be said to be civilized are either white or east asian majority. Everywhere else is a poor shithole. If enough of you move here, this country will start to reflect that, I don't like that.
Well there it is, honesty at least
You're racist, I get it. Same thing when picrel happened and /int/ was celebrating the man who did that. But if a black guy did that, it'd be black fathers this and black fathers that. It's a very lizard brain reaction, which is expected from a tard
But remember. These things go both ways. And when it's time for us to be cruel to you, the way that you've been cruel to us, well, let's just say that /pol/ will have enough material to last a lifetime
>There is no difference, but it's up to you to set your own country's immigration policies and I'm in no position to really comment. If you don't want to let him in, fine. What i won't do is try to shame you into letting him in based on some imagined historic wrongdoing.
>I think the threat is racial. There's too much of a risk of miscegenation, that'll mean the disappearance of my people. Already I'm seeing too many zoomers with jeet girlfriends where I live. The second is that I don't see the races moving in as being capable of upholding a first world economy.
That's not the way the world has been set up to work, by your own ancestors ironically, and you know it. It's a global economy of trade; of goods, of ideas and yes, of people. If you don't like it, you could always build a time machine and go to the past and change the mind of Queen Victoria or Columbus or James Cook or something