>>95859314
>>95859332
>Did you seriously expect this question to not have an answer
On the contrary. I actually expected your retarded answer where you list that you are going to play a deck of 90% 1-2 mana removal spells and Oko, and everything that specifically stops RDW maindeck somehow.
My follow up questions that you won't answer and will continue to make you look retarded is:
>What is the deck you are describing going to do against literally any other standard deck?
and
>What's the point of saying Oko will stop generic RDW slop when you have to add the gargantuan caveat of "oh and also a quarter of my deck has to be removal and also I have to run main-deck Authority of the Consuls and it has to be super low to the ground and and and and..." Does this not undermine your earlier statement? At that point it sounds like you can just....remove Oko from the equation and just play UW control and be better off.
It's just a very very stupid hypothetical for small brained theory crafters.
>"w-w-what if I configure my entire entire deck to beat on one specific matchup!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Then you probably win that one matchup. Good job, man.