Search Results
7/8/2025, 8:44:30 PM
>>149317130
>it was filoni
No, it was George Lucas.
>Lucas: Yeah, now we get introduced to the clones, which we didn’t get in the movies. Now, they’re like main characters and they really are central to the whole thing, and you can identify them and know who they are, and it’s sort of like “Band of Brothers” only with Jedi.
>“Even though they’re clones, clones are people. Everybody starts out the same, but in time, as they grow up, they change.”—George Lucas
>"Again, all of these stories originated with George, and he wanted to tell the story of Order 66. He seemed very interested in getting into the details of that story and what drives it. From my earliest conversations with George coming onto Clone Wars, as far back as 2005 when I put to him "What was Order 66, and how did it work?”, he was always connected to the idea that it was somewhat of a Manchurian Candidate concept. When the order goes down, it's not like the clones have a real way to say, "No, I'm not going to do this.”
>"Karen Traviss, she didn't get everything right. It is very clear if you watch ROTS, that [Order 66] is not an order on the books. And it's simple from this one detail, that Traviss ignored, but the detail is when Sidious shows up as a hologram and says, 'Execute Order 66,' the clones say, 'It will be done, my lord.' Not 'yes, sir,' not 'yes, chancellor.' 'It will be done, my lord.' The brain washing kicks in the moment they hear the words 'Order 66,' and they look at that hologram and they see god. They see the man responsible for their creation, Darth Sidious, and that's what it is. Commander Cody has never seen a Sith Lord. If you are going to take Lucas and Filoni to task for changing the Mandalorians, you have to take Karen Traviss to task for changing one of the most key plot points of the entire saga."—Sam Witwer
>the entire point of the prequel trilogy
Yeah, and clones were just programmed tools, used and discarded.
>it was filoni
No, it was George Lucas.
>Lucas: Yeah, now we get introduced to the clones, which we didn’t get in the movies. Now, they’re like main characters and they really are central to the whole thing, and you can identify them and know who they are, and it’s sort of like “Band of Brothers” only with Jedi.
>“Even though they’re clones, clones are people. Everybody starts out the same, but in time, as they grow up, they change.”—George Lucas
>"Again, all of these stories originated with George, and he wanted to tell the story of Order 66. He seemed very interested in getting into the details of that story and what drives it. From my earliest conversations with George coming onto Clone Wars, as far back as 2005 when I put to him "What was Order 66, and how did it work?”, he was always connected to the idea that it was somewhat of a Manchurian Candidate concept. When the order goes down, it's not like the clones have a real way to say, "No, I'm not going to do this.”
>"Karen Traviss, she didn't get everything right. It is very clear if you watch ROTS, that [Order 66] is not an order on the books. And it's simple from this one detail, that Traviss ignored, but the detail is when Sidious shows up as a hologram and says, 'Execute Order 66,' the clones say, 'It will be done, my lord.' Not 'yes, sir,' not 'yes, chancellor.' 'It will be done, my lord.' The brain washing kicks in the moment they hear the words 'Order 66,' and they look at that hologram and they see god. They see the man responsible for their creation, Darth Sidious, and that's what it is. Commander Cody has never seen a Sith Lord. If you are going to take Lucas and Filoni to task for changing the Mandalorians, you have to take Karen Traviss to task for changing one of the most key plot points of the entire saga."—Sam Witwer
>the entire point of the prequel trilogy
Yeah, and clones were just programmed tools, used and discarded.
Page 1