>MAGA should actually be hoping a few Republicans end up on there too so people actually believe it.
So what do you think of pic related, without melting down about a letterfag?

One of the most annoying trends /pol/ ever experienced was watching a ton of sour grapes faggots abandon all sense in favor of shitting on a letterfag who managed to get more attention to his shitposts than any /pol/tard in history. Pic related is a list of people in politics on both sides that were taken down for real, actual pedo shit. It was so effective that Democrats took the list, eliminated all the Democrat entries, and then reformatted it and passed it off as their own, all the while attacking Q as much as the faggots here do(what a coincidence).

>>510539968
Stop talking about shit you know nothing about.

>>509895137
>It’s just the liberals!
I like how you have to make up shit I didn't say because you can't address what I actually said.

>>509895261
>So you were aware of what he wrote in the book, yet you posted that quote in bad faith?
The quotes I posted are consistent. You're the one using plebbit spacing to scream and rage that I provided more context than you did, because you operate on concealing anything said that doesn't jive with your preferred narrative.

>>509895120
yup