>>527227524
You have the wrong Act in mind

>>527227162
1996/1997 is hardly pure Gen Z.
More like Zillennial

>>527224825
>I knew some very attractive lesbians and every one of them went straight in the end

Translation: They were lying about their sexuality in order to turn down invitations from guys they weren't attracted to

>>527183935
Really? Than you must have been browsing this place from well before you were officially allowed to

>>527247683
NTA, I can only speak for 2011 and onwards.
The humour was more innocent (if not exactly kid-friendly) and outright internet fights were considerably rarer, because people knew not to take this place too seriously.

Our attention spans hadn't been deep-fried yet, so it was possible to start a convo without the written equivalent of shouting and doing some sort of tribal dance at the same time.
Also no captchas or waiting times.
I'd argue it was slightly closer to how I imagine Japanese imageboards to be

If any oldfag here wishes to correct what faint memories I have of the ancient version of this place, please do