>>11261925
>don't need to be soft on women in the scene
>idea of wage slavery
Could tie the "soft" or more comfortable aspects of wage slaving into a system of women needing male guarantors.
Having a man negotiate her terms for a cut of her wage like a temp agency or there's a "under the table" sexual arrangement between women and their guarantor.
If She goes it alone the system is set up to abuse these independent women.

>>11261882
As it relates to the ideas of:
>women too prideful to submit at first
>Lesbians could even have their own marriage
Even if women try to go their own way their lives will be made miserable for it.
So there's always the option of the "easy option" of giving up some freedom to a guarantor.
Or complete submission in marriage or some lewd concubine/lover arrangement

>>11262415
Kill the other thread, OP was messed up