>>510296876
Be the change you want to see

>>509129746
>It's argued between 1995 and 2000.
>>509130269
>these hard cutoffs for demographic cohorts make no sense.
The "baby boom" happened. The resulting children were called baby boomers. Then faggots had to come up with names for everyone else since. Never made a lick of sense, but that's people for you.

>>508457037
>>508457066
Thank you.
BRB, awakening my kundalini. Sheated gigapeen, here I come!