>>40513963
>they also have declination correction
According to your model there are declination corrections below the 60th south parallel that are close to 180 degrees, meaning when the compass says it’s pointing north, the globe model wants you to believe its actually pointing south in the exact opposite direction. Its not something that you can actually investigate and confirm for yourself of course since, conveniently for the globe deception, due to the Antarctic treaty, we are not allowed to independently and freely explore below the 60th south parallel:

Sorry, Antarctica is Closed - Preventive Measures Against Independent and Free Exploration Below the 60th South Parallel::
https://youtu.be/SmYRFtY_jfQ

The magnetic declination claims are yet another method of hiding the true shape of our realm. Educate yourself:
No Magnetic Declination on the Flat Earth - PART 1:
https://youtu.be/YvZ3tMqyjHo

> It's literally just electricity-based magnetic induction
>can’t provide any empirical evidence for the claimed cause of the magnetic field in his model
>links to Wikipedia instead

lol. Yes, the current geodynamo model claims that Earth’s magnetic field is static charge that's generated from the friction caused by the motion of the convection currents (which allows them to claim that they can ignore the curie point issue), but it's unproven and 100% theoretical science that they invented just for their geodynamo model, that they are still having a hard time modeling, to this day. In other words, just like their claimed cause of gravity, the claimed cause of the magnetic field is pseudoscience by definition.