Search Results
7/17/2025, 9:40:00 PM
>>81864833
Well you've got a problem then.
New claimants for UC disability will have half the amount as before. Current claimaints are protected, but only for their current claim. They're easily dealt with by just rejecting their next reassessment. They'll have to appeal and go to tribunal, which is then considered a new claim if they win it. So they'll get half the amount.
In the future once it's all done, you'll need PIP to get UC disability at all. PIP points will require 4 points or more. Not now, since it was scrapped for a concession, right? Except it's only been scrapped until after the review. Who is leading the review? Stephen Timms. A man that supported the entire bill from the beginning, and is part of the CSJ which Ian Duncan Smith is a part of. They are radically against the benefit system and basically want it eradicated. As far as CSJ, Timms, IDS are concerned, poor = you are a bad person. On benefits? Bad person. Lazy. You need to do better. Change your mindset etc
His review will no doubt find that actually a 4 point minimum is a good idea, or maybe even higher. Then the government will implement it. So you see the concession to the rebel MP's was at best a delay. Except he can use the time before then to oust rebel leaders, which means it can then be even tougher than originally planned.
Looks bad short term, these "concessions". Long run? Masterfully done. Cunning as a fox.
After this, they'll change descriptors for PIP (The criteria you are rated for points on) and make them harder as well. After all, work is good for your mental health and will cure depression and anxiety. You should work for your own sake. In the end you'll only get bennies if you're what would have been considered disabled in the 1950's.
I'm not even shitposting. This is seriously what they are doing. You will work.
Well you've got a problem then.
New claimants for UC disability will have half the amount as before. Current claimaints are protected, but only for their current claim. They're easily dealt with by just rejecting their next reassessment. They'll have to appeal and go to tribunal, which is then considered a new claim if they win it. So they'll get half the amount.
In the future once it's all done, you'll need PIP to get UC disability at all. PIP points will require 4 points or more. Not now, since it was scrapped for a concession, right? Except it's only been scrapped until after the review. Who is leading the review? Stephen Timms. A man that supported the entire bill from the beginning, and is part of the CSJ which Ian Duncan Smith is a part of. They are radically against the benefit system and basically want it eradicated. As far as CSJ, Timms, IDS are concerned, poor = you are a bad person. On benefits? Bad person. Lazy. You need to do better. Change your mindset etc
His review will no doubt find that actually a 4 point minimum is a good idea, or maybe even higher. Then the government will implement it. So you see the concession to the rebel MP's was at best a delay. Except he can use the time before then to oust rebel leaders, which means it can then be even tougher than originally planned.
Looks bad short term, these "concessions". Long run? Masterfully done. Cunning as a fox.
After this, they'll change descriptors for PIP (The criteria you are rated for points on) and make them harder as well. After all, work is good for your mental health and will cure depression and anxiety. You should work for your own sake. In the end you'll only get bennies if you're what would have been considered disabled in the 1950's.
I'm not even shitposting. This is seriously what they are doing. You will work.
Page 1