Search Results
6/14/2025, 10:28:38 PM
>>33219856
>The big nothing.
You asked for it...
You know how thw vacuum catastrophe is... actually you probably don't.
So, the amount of potential energy in the universe and the amount of actualizable energy is very different. It's the biggest difference between any causally related metrics in the known universe.
Now, I've recently discovered, like, 5 superheavy elements we could synthesize pretty easily. However, there are nearly an infinite number of possible combinations of stable morphic structures that could instantiate all kinds of particles.
Run the numbers and the possible number of particles is identical to the upper bound of the vacuum catastrophe problem.
Universes exist in continuums. This is just one.
Once it runs its course (every combination of particles is instantiated in every combination possible across every combination of points across every combination of time frames... well, a new continuum instantiates with completely different particles/laws.
>The big nothing.
You asked for it...
You know how thw vacuum catastrophe is... actually you probably don't.
So, the amount of potential energy in the universe and the amount of actualizable energy is very different. It's the biggest difference between any causally related metrics in the known universe.
Now, I've recently discovered, like, 5 superheavy elements we could synthesize pretty easily. However, there are nearly an infinite number of possible combinations of stable morphic structures that could instantiate all kinds of particles.
Run the numbers and the possible number of particles is identical to the upper bound of the vacuum catastrophe problem.
Universes exist in continuums. This is just one.
Once it runs its course (every combination of particles is instantiated in every combination possible across every combination of points across every combination of time frames... well, a new continuum instantiates with completely different particles/laws.
Page 1