Search Results
7/17/2025, 12:18:11 AM
>>149424556
I think so. They wouldn't have needed to lean so heavily into other non-Disney IPs since the gimmick was already introduced and Roger Rabbit's name alone would have probably attracted a large audience for a sequel. But that window's closed a long time ago by now. Few people are going to get hyped for Roger Rabbit in 2025. Anyways, we kind of see the themes a sequel could have worked with in the comics.
I think so. They wouldn't have needed to lean so heavily into other non-Disney IPs since the gimmick was already introduced and Roger Rabbit's name alone would have probably attracted a large audience for a sequel. But that window's closed a long time ago by now. Few people are going to get hyped for Roger Rabbit in 2025. Anyways, we kind of see the themes a sequel could have worked with in the comics.
Page 1