Search Results
8/2/2025, 9:21:33 AM
Mother to 2 so I'll answer.
>Do normie women actually know the science between maternal age and fertility or are they in the dark?
We know, most don't care or don't plan to have children. The majority of my friends do not have kids, and are not married. The dream of marriage died somewhere between millenials and GenZ, and what you see on social media is not necessarily true in person. For example, on TikTok you'll see many women whining about being single mothers, but in person I only know a handful who became single mothers due to divorce, and that's family, not friends. People just don't care to build a family anymore.
>I just assumed women having children in their 40s was as healthy as having them as a teenager.
Women talk about this ALL THE TIME. Most decide around 16-18 whether it's for them or not, and they'll either stick to it or change their mind. My more maternal friends all had kids before me. Those that hated the thought of marriage or motherhood did not. I did not want kids as a teenager, but after 7 years of being happily married, and paying of all debts I changed my mind.
>Like are all the women who suddenly try to have kids in their 30s and 40s blind to the risks, or are they just reckless and irresponsible?
Most OB's will tell you that late 20s is healthy. I was almost 30 with my first and had no issues. Second baby early 30s, still no issues.
>I went about showing them studies showing it's late teenage and early twenties and the AI reverted to basically saying "lol yeah, you're right to call me out, but I didn't want to promote teen pregnancy".
AI is trained by humans following specific guidelines set by a client who hires a 3rd party company that provides feedback on responses. Also, late 20s is not bad at all, and while teenagers will recover faster, they can have many more complications due to physical immaturity. If you want a healthy baby, younger can be better. You want the mom to live? She needs to be more mature.
>Do normie women actually know the science between maternal age and fertility or are they in the dark?
We know, most don't care or don't plan to have children. The majority of my friends do not have kids, and are not married. The dream of marriage died somewhere between millenials and GenZ, and what you see on social media is not necessarily true in person. For example, on TikTok you'll see many women whining about being single mothers, but in person I only know a handful who became single mothers due to divorce, and that's family, not friends. People just don't care to build a family anymore.
>I just assumed women having children in their 40s was as healthy as having them as a teenager.
Women talk about this ALL THE TIME. Most decide around 16-18 whether it's for them or not, and they'll either stick to it or change their mind. My more maternal friends all had kids before me. Those that hated the thought of marriage or motherhood did not. I did not want kids as a teenager, but after 7 years of being happily married, and paying of all debts I changed my mind.
>Like are all the women who suddenly try to have kids in their 30s and 40s blind to the risks, or are they just reckless and irresponsible?
Most OB's will tell you that late 20s is healthy. I was almost 30 with my first and had no issues. Second baby early 30s, still no issues.
>I went about showing them studies showing it's late teenage and early twenties and the AI reverted to basically saying "lol yeah, you're right to call me out, but I didn't want to promote teen pregnancy".
AI is trained by humans following specific guidelines set by a client who hires a 3rd party company that provides feedback on responses. Also, late 20s is not bad at all, and while teenagers will recover faster, they can have many more complications due to physical immaturity. If you want a healthy baby, younger can be better. You want the mom to live? She needs to be more mature.
Page 1