>>40381197
>commitments to one perspective will always prevent you from developing a better understanding...
i think like the exact opposite. to really have a good understanding of something you need immersion in it for a long time. often the fruits of a way of thinking are very deep into the complexity of the process, a good example is something like calculus.
>you seem very rigid in your thinking, mainly what seems to be a lot of older entrenched influences, internalism, cognitivism, and your skepticism and so on
what's wrong with believing the things you think are correct?
>extreme and dogmatic
not sure how that's dogmatic. its just preferring to avoid a term

>>81654463
nobody ever solves problems. we just fall backwards into them

there is nothing sadder than a tgirl that works minimum age retail