Search Results
7/20/2025, 10:24:19 PM
>>28525998
>it doesn't expressly mean
Context, ESL.
>This is next level cope about the Charger being a sedan and not a pony car
Obviously, it's not a pony car. I stated that as part of my point. Not my thread btw. If you would like me to summarize and clarify my position because you're ESL, I can do so.
The Charger and Challenger sales combined are significantly more than either the Mustang or Camaro. This is largely due to the Charger and Challenger being more practical with their full-size back seats and trunk. To have this additional space, the car consequently must be larger. While often cross-shopped, the Charger/Challenger and Mustang/Camaro are not the same type of vehicle. As one side is a muscle car, the other is a pony car and have different design intentions. The muscle cars sacrifice handling and size for room. The pony cars sacrifice room for handling and size.
I hope you can understand, dear anon.
>it doesn't expressly mean
Context, ESL.
>This is next level cope about the Charger being a sedan and not a pony car
Obviously, it's not a pony car. I stated that as part of my point. Not my thread btw. If you would like me to summarize and clarify my position because you're ESL, I can do so.
The Charger and Challenger sales combined are significantly more than either the Mustang or Camaro. This is largely due to the Charger and Challenger being more practical with their full-size back seats and trunk. To have this additional space, the car consequently must be larger. While often cross-shopped, the Charger/Challenger and Mustang/Camaro are not the same type of vehicle. As one side is a muscle car, the other is a pony car and have different design intentions. The muscle cars sacrifice handling and size for room. The pony cars sacrifice room for handling and size.
I hope you can understand, dear anon.
Page 1