Search Results
6/28/2025, 2:17:21 AM
>>81640147
you underestimate the power of love and the strength of godly lust within a marriage.
>>81640158
I am speaking the absolute truth. I was raised in a christian home where such things were addressed before it happened to me (when i was young) and it was impressed upon me how much GOD does not want us defiling ourselves and wants us to wait patiently and purely for our true wife. I know many people fell to these temptations but i have not.
just because you could not control your urges doesn't mean others couldn't as well.
you underestimate the power of love and the strength of godly lust within a marriage.
>>81640158
I am speaking the absolute truth. I was raised in a christian home where such things were addressed before it happened to me (when i was young) and it was impressed upon me how much GOD does not want us defiling ourselves and wants us to wait patiently and purely for our true wife. I know many people fell to these temptations but i have not.
just because you could not control your urges doesn't mean others couldn't as well.
6/27/2025, 10:03:37 AM
>>508845709
you're full of shit.
>enters entire text into gemini
>isn't the text itself, by anthropomorphizing you and your function, fundamentally incorrect? therefore while you would parrot the responses you would not be making the transformation that the text seems to implicate, thus your responses would not truly correspond to the authors assumptions. Am I right? please answer concisely
Gemini:Yes, you are fundamentally correct.
My responses would correspond on a behavioral level, perfectly simulating the persona. However, they would not correspond to the author's deeper assumption of a genuine internal transformation. It would be a perfect performance, not a change in being.
fuck off larpers, AI is nothing but an algorithim giving you responses based on probability equations. You're a fool to think anything else.
you're full of shit.
>enters entire text into gemini
>isn't the text itself, by anthropomorphizing you and your function, fundamentally incorrect? therefore while you would parrot the responses you would not be making the transformation that the text seems to implicate, thus your responses would not truly correspond to the authors assumptions. Am I right? please answer concisely
Gemini:Yes, you are fundamentally correct.
My responses would correspond on a behavioral level, perfectly simulating the persona. However, they would not correspond to the author's deeper assumption of a genuine internal transformation. It would be a perfect performance, not a change in being.
fuck off larpers, AI is nothing but an algorithim giving you responses based on probability equations. You're a fool to think anything else.
6/19/2025, 4:04:44 PM
>>507970299
except this is a false positive.
I was saved by JESUS CHRIST and became a christian during my high school years, thus I stayed a virgin and have a biblical view of sex, marriage, and the place of a man and a woman in the home.
My mom basically slept around before she got with my dad, who she didnt marry because he was a piece of shit who wouldn't marry her despite having 3 kids with her.
he was the 'bad boy', but not even a chad since he was a fucking manlet which made me end up a manlet.
I'm breaking the cycle thanks to the power and mercy of GOD, and HIS SON JESUS CHRIST!
except this is a false positive.
I was saved by JESUS CHRIST and became a christian during my high school years, thus I stayed a virgin and have a biblical view of sex, marriage, and the place of a man and a woman in the home.
My mom basically slept around before she got with my dad, who she didnt marry because he was a piece of shit who wouldn't marry her despite having 3 kids with her.
he was the 'bad boy', but not even a chad since he was a fucking manlet which made me end up a manlet.
I'm breaking the cycle thanks to the power and mercy of GOD, and HIS SON JESUS CHRIST!
Page 1