>>512347744
i saved your same fucking thread from the other day to read over it, which i sometimes do when it looks like a good one and normally i ss the best responses to save so i can post later if the situation presents itself. but i have to say most of your posts are quite esoteric and not that substantive or maybe i am just too low iq to understand them, in that case, the onus is on OP to make their ideas coherant and substantive to low iq plebs like me to ensure a greater proliferation of ideas to the maximum number of people. since i felt that you didnt do that well enough, i didnt save any of your posts. this is me leaving you a bad review also if OP has like 50+ pbti then usually the thread is just a complete schitzo echo chamber (ur last thread had over 117+pbti) anyway, also sage