Search Results
6/24/2025, 8:21:18 AM
>>63886287
>all the know nothings itt
A b2 contains the following crew and amenities:
4 pilots
8 comfort women
2 state rooms (each with attached toilet, shower and kitchen)
Common area
1 xbox 360
1 tv, 72 inch
2 controllers
No less than 16 rolls of tp per state room
A 7-11, mcdonalds, or starbucks drive through (interchangeable)
Golf cart for internal transport
Janitor
Prison for misbehaving comfort women/fast food servant/janitor
Small museum displaying previous targets hit
And the collected works of ac/dc on cd, with a backup on tape.
>all the know nothings itt
A b2 contains the following crew and amenities:
4 pilots
8 comfort women
2 state rooms (each with attached toilet, shower and kitchen)
Common area
1 xbox 360
1 tv, 72 inch
2 controllers
No less than 16 rolls of tp per state room
A 7-11, mcdonalds, or starbucks drive through (interchangeable)
Golf cart for internal transport
Janitor
Prison for misbehaving comfort women/fast food servant/janitor
Small museum displaying previous targets hit
And the collected works of ac/dc on cd, with a backup on tape.
6/17/2025, 11:22:17 AM
>>24463139
I am neutral about it.
I do not plan to reproduce, but I am not particularly bothered by people who do reproduce. I would advise them against reproduction, but it ultimately doesn't matter.
Existence is a problem that will solve itself. Roughly 99.9% of species that ever existed on this planet are already extinct. There have already been several mass-extinction events (yes, even without humans burning fossil fuels). We will likely die in the next.
Even from an individual perspective, human life only lasts a century at best. You have been dead for billions of years before birth, and you will be dead forever after your death. So what difference does it make if you are alive and suffer for a century? The moral thing to do would be to prevent the birth of a child, but even if the child does get born the harm to him is negligible: only one century of suffering at most, compared to an eternity of non-suffering after death. Does it really matter?
I am neutral about it.
I do not plan to reproduce, but I am not particularly bothered by people who do reproduce. I would advise them against reproduction, but it ultimately doesn't matter.
Existence is a problem that will solve itself. Roughly 99.9% of species that ever existed on this planet are already extinct. There have already been several mass-extinction events (yes, even without humans burning fossil fuels). We will likely die in the next.
Even from an individual perspective, human life only lasts a century at best. You have been dead for billions of years before birth, and you will be dead forever after your death. So what difference does it make if you are alive and suffer for a century? The moral thing to do would be to prevent the birth of a child, but even if the child does get born the harm to him is negligible: only one century of suffering at most, compared to an eternity of non-suffering after death. Does it really matter?
Page 1