>>530436528
>Well they're currently on track to be one of the best performing banners on the year so...
Would it even be out of C-tier here?

>>530123126
>The New Years banner did really well.
But it didn't. The chartfag is just a fan of book 8, so he tossed it up higher because he did that with 7's after the earthquake.
It should be down there with Fallen.

>>714447607
The one that starred Engage and Echoes? Yes, it was the worst performing summer banner ever.
Summer is usually Top 5 (for both summer banners), but this one won't even be Top 15.