Search Results
6/30/2025, 11:27:39 PM
>>17804627
>Motte-and-Bailey fallacy, you're trying to frame pedophillia as normal and innocent
I haven't made a single value judgement, I have only pointed out thus far that your claim that children are not physically prepared for sex is false.
>there is still a major issue regarding power dynamics and adults taking advantage of people with less life experience and are physically weaker than them
None of which is implied by an adult-child sexual relation. This could be true of any relationship between two people of unequal powers, and is not exclusive to a sexual relation. Women are not equal, physically or mentally, to men. Does this therefore mean that sexual relations with women are wrong?
>Next your argument is going to be "children want sexual relations with adults"
There are plenty of anthropological examples of children openly and willingly engaging in sexual relations with adults in that thread posted, the first excerpt for example:
>Murphy and Quain (1955 [1966:p83-4]) reported that “there was no heterosexual activity between children, for there were no girls of appropriate age in the village. Thus, pre-pubescent sexual relations occurred between boys or between boys and men, and almost always it was the boys who were the instigators. […] The minor homosexual engagements that took place between the boys themselves were […] in the nature of play”, while no adult homosexuality was seen. “The sexual play of a young child might even include his father”; at least, one is reported to manipulate a boy in erection, without much consideration for observers.
Furthermore, A Finnish survey conducted on sixth and ninth graders which asked respondents whether or not they had experienced sexual relations with an adult found that 46% of boy respondents that had sexual relations with an adult reported initiating the contact, of which 82% recalled the experience positively.
>Motte-and-Bailey fallacy, you're trying to frame pedophillia as normal and innocent
I haven't made a single value judgement, I have only pointed out thus far that your claim that children are not physically prepared for sex is false.
>there is still a major issue regarding power dynamics and adults taking advantage of people with less life experience and are physically weaker than them
None of which is implied by an adult-child sexual relation. This could be true of any relationship between two people of unequal powers, and is not exclusive to a sexual relation. Women are not equal, physically or mentally, to men. Does this therefore mean that sexual relations with women are wrong?
>Next your argument is going to be "children want sexual relations with adults"
There are plenty of anthropological examples of children openly and willingly engaging in sexual relations with adults in that thread posted, the first excerpt for example:
>Murphy and Quain (1955 [1966:p83-4]) reported that “there was no heterosexual activity between children, for there were no girls of appropriate age in the village. Thus, pre-pubescent sexual relations occurred between boys or between boys and men, and almost always it was the boys who were the instigators. […] The minor homosexual engagements that took place between the boys themselves were […] in the nature of play”, while no adult homosexuality was seen. “The sexual play of a young child might even include his father”; at least, one is reported to manipulate a boy in erection, without much consideration for observers.
Furthermore, A Finnish survey conducted on sixth and ninth graders which asked respondents whether or not they had experienced sexual relations with an adult found that 46% of boy respondents that had sexual relations with an adult reported initiating the contact, of which 82% recalled the experience positively.
6/15/2025, 5:24:49 AM
Page 1