>>11769394
>>11769439
You know, I wasn't siding with either of you and was actually saying that both of you are retarded, but the combination of
A) you not picking up on that
B) you didn't think to just reload the page
C) the other guy giving a a good response I didn't consider
doesn't do you any favors at all.
also,
>Of course you're a pedophile/furry/both.
The fact you thought I was talking about the lolis or pokemon is projecting HARD.