>>507955523
They aren't able to argue in good faith because they are shills running a system of usury that is exposed with logic and reason.
It is well documented who they are and how they argue.

> The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic.
> First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid.
> If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which,
> if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended > not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like > slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these > fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at
> least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he
> rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he
> couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.
> Gradually I began to hate them
> Adolf Hitler