>>714588390
WHY IS EVERY FUCKING ANSWER TO THIS MISSING THE POINT???
>Why providing continued support do not work for all games
NO ONE IS ASKING THAT?
THE PETITION IS NOT ABOUT FORCING ANYONE TO PROVIDE CONTINUED SUPPORT
>The decision to discontinue a video game's online services is multi-faceted and is never taken lightly and must always be a matter of choice.
>NO ONE IS TAKING AWAY THAT CHOICE FROM DEVELOPERS AND THE PETITION ISN'T ABOUT THAT
>The right to decide how, when, and for how long to make an online video game services available to players is vital in justifying this cost and fostering continued technical innovation. As rightsholders and economic entities, video games companies must remain free to decide when an online game is no longer commercially viable and to end continued server support for that game.
AND FUCKING NO ONE IS DISPUTING THAT
THE PETITION ISN'T ABOUT THAT

PIC MOTHERFUCKING RELATED IS WHAT THIS PETITION IS ABOUT
WANT TO END THE SERVICE AND SERVERS FOR YOUR ARENA SHOOTER? DO SO
WANT TO END THE SERVICE AND SERVERS FOR THAT RACING GAME? DO SO
WANT TO END THE SERVICE AND SERVERS FOR YOUR TACTICAL FIRST PERSON SHOOTER? DO SO
WANT TO END THE SERVICE AND SERVERS FOR YOUR RTS? DO SO
ALL WE ASK IS THAT WHEN YOU DO SO, YOU UPDATE THE GAME TO BE ABLE TO CONNECT TO CUSTOM HOSTED SERVERS, NO PROGRESSION, NO GACHA, NO LOOTS, NOTHING THAT ACTUALLY REQUIRED ACTIVE DEVELOPER MAINTENANCE, JUST FUCKING BEING ABLE TO JOIN A PLAYER HOSTED GAME TO FUCKING PLAY THE GAME
CLAIMING DOING SO HAS UNJUSTIFIABLE AND PROHIBITIVE COSTS AND RISKS IS A FUCKING EXCUSE AND A NON-ARGUMENT WHEN MOTHERFUKING PIC RELATED DID IT, ALL ONLINE GAMES WERE ABLE TO DO IT WHEN COSTS WHERE A FRACTION OF WHAT THEY ARE NOW, STOP PUTTING UP BULLSHIT EXCUSES THAT CAN BE REFUTED WITH LITERAL CURRENTLY EXISTING GAMES THAT DO OFFER WHAT YOU CLAIM TO BE IMPOSSIBLE

FUCKING DO IT